header-logo header-logo

Whose land is it anyway?

22 April 2016 / Sarah Dawe , Nick Hopkins
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7695_hopkins

Nick Hopkins & Sarah Dawe consider the challenge of registered title fraud

On 31 March, the Law Commission published its consultation paper, Updating the Land Registration Act 2002 . With around 86% of land in England and Wales now registered, amounting to over 24 million registered titles, any inefficiencies or uncertainties in the land registration system can have a significant impact on the property market. Land registration also has wider importance for business and the economy. The World Bank Group recently suggested in Doing Business 2016: Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency that a “well-designed land administration system…makes it possible for the property market to exist and to operate”.

The consultation paper provides a wide-ranging review of the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002), but it is not directed at a comprehensive reformulation. The aim is to update LRA 2002 within its existing legal framework, in light of the experience of its operation. The topics covered in the review are mainly technical, but are practically significant. Some of the topics touch on broader ideas

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll