header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 April 2016 / Sarah Dawe , Nick Hopkins
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Whose land is it anyway?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
001_nlj_7695_hopkins

Nick Hopkins & Sarah Dawe consider the challenge of registered title fraud

On 31 March, the Law Commission published its consultation paper, Updating the Land Registration Act 2002 . With around 86% of land in England and Wales now registered, amounting to over 24 million registered titles, any inefficiencies or uncertainties in the land registration system can have a significant impact on the property market. Land registration also has wider importance for business and the economy. The World Bank Group recently suggested in Doing Business 2016: Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency that a “well-designed land administration system…makes it possible for the property market to exist and to operate”.

The consultation paper provides a wide-ranging review of the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002), but it is not directed at a comprehensive reformulation. The aim is to update LRA 2002 within its existing legal framework, in light of the experience of its operation. The topics covered in the review are mainly technical, but are practically significant. Some of the topics touch on broader ideas

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll