header-logo header-logo

Whose land is it anyway?

22 April 2016 / Sarah Dawe , Nick Hopkins
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7695_hopkins

Nick Hopkins & Sarah Dawe consider the challenge of registered title fraud

On 31 March, the Law Commission published its consultation paper, Updating the Land Registration Act 2002 . With around 86% of land in England and Wales now registered, amounting to over 24 million registered titles, any inefficiencies or uncertainties in the land registration system can have a significant impact on the property market. Land registration also has wider importance for business and the economy. The World Bank Group recently suggested in Doing Business 2016: Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency that a “well-designed land administration system…makes it possible for the property market to exist and to operate”.

The consultation paper provides a wide-ranging review of the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002), but it is not directed at a comprehensive reformulation. The aim is to update LRA 2002 within its existing legal framework, in light of the experience of its operation. The topics covered in the review are mainly technical, but are practically significant. Some of the topics touch on broader ideas

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll