header-logo header-logo

20 November 2015 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Why is it worth it?

nlj_7677_solon

Mark Solon considers the benefits of witness familiarisation

Witness familiarisation is a process that has become very popular over the past few years, but which is sometimes misunderstood by lawyers and the courts. It is sometimes confused with the idea of witness coaching which is absolutely prohibited by the Bar Standards Board and the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority.

Witness familiarisation, however, is perfectly permissible. It familiarises a witness, lay or expert, with the theory, practice and procedure of giving evidence, but without coaching them in any way on the content of that evidence.

Giving evidence and being cross-examined before a court can be daunting for even the most brave-hearted. Preparing witnesses for what to expect is therefore crucial to ensure they are not disadvantaged by ignorance of the process. Many practitioners realise the importance of supporting witnesses and there has been much commentary of the importance of witnesses not being harassed in court.

Reasonable cost?

Solicitors and barristers are permitted, within the rules, to prepare witnesses but when the preparation is provided by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll