header-logo header-logo

Why is it worth it?

20 November 2015 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7677_solon

Mark Solon considers the benefits of witness familiarisation

Witness familiarisation is a process that has become very popular over the past few years, but which is sometimes misunderstood by lawyers and the courts. It is sometimes confused with the idea of witness coaching which is absolutely prohibited by the Bar Standards Board and the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority.

Witness familiarisation, however, is perfectly permissible. It familiarises a witness, lay or expert, with the theory, practice and procedure of giving evidence, but without coaching them in any way on the content of that evidence.

Giving evidence and being cross-examined before a court can be daunting for even the most brave-hearted. Preparing witnesses for what to expect is therefore crucial to ensure they are not disadvantaged by ignorance of the process. Many practitioners realise the importance of supporting witnesses and there has been much commentary of the importance of witnesses not being harassed in court.

Reasonable cost?

Solicitors and barristers are permitted, within the rules, to prepare witnesses but when the preparation is provided by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll