header-logo header-logo

20 November 2015 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Why is it worth it?

nlj_7677_solon

Mark Solon considers the benefits of witness familiarisation

Witness familiarisation is a process that has become very popular over the past few years, but which is sometimes misunderstood by lawyers and the courts. It is sometimes confused with the idea of witness coaching which is absolutely prohibited by the Bar Standards Board and the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority.

Witness familiarisation, however, is perfectly permissible. It familiarises a witness, lay or expert, with the theory, practice and procedure of giving evidence, but without coaching them in any way on the content of that evidence.

Giving evidence and being cross-examined before a court can be daunting for even the most brave-hearted. Preparing witnesses for what to expect is therefore crucial to ensure they are not disadvantaged by ignorance of the process. Many practitioners realise the importance of supporting witnesses and there has been much commentary of the importance of witnesses not being harassed in court.

Reasonable cost?

Solicitors and barristers are permitted, within the rules, to prepare witnesses but when the preparation is provided by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll