header-logo header-logo

Why Pre-action Protocol Number 13 is bad news for creditors

23 February 2018
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail
nlj_7782_thompson

Pre-action Protocol Number 13 ‘must be the biggest turn-off for creditors since the Grayling hike in court fees’, Peter Thompson QC, general editor, Civil Court Practice (The Green Book), writes in this week’s NLJ.

Thompson says the protocol adds to the administrative burden for creditors, creating extra hurdles before they can go to court, and could act as a deterrent to some, Thompson says. For example, it requires creditors to produce an extra 10 pages of documents including an information sheet, response form and statement of income and expenditure, and builds an extra 30 days response time.

Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll