header-logo header-logo

Wide of the mark?

17 February 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7734_samuels

Is there a judge’s jurisdictional problem, asks Alec Samuels

Lawyers tend to think in terms of civil or family or criminal. New QCs are classified in this way. The High Court is divided into Queen’s Bench, Family and Chancery, though subdivisions appear such as Admiralty, Commercial, Technology and Construction, and Planning in the Queen’s Bench, Court of Protection in Family, and Companies and Bankruptcy and Patents in Chancery. Public law and human rights law come largely by way of judicial review through the Administrative Court. Increasingly today the practitioner tends to specialise more and more in an ever-narrowing area of work, particularly the barrister but also, albeit to a lesser extent, the solicitor. The practitioner responds to the demands and opportunities of the market. Legal life seems to be getting ever more complicated—and specialised.

Diverse work

Now it is most unlikely that the judge can remain anything like so specialised. The circuit or county court judge may be largely civil or largely criminal, but usually he may be called upon to handle almost any case.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll