header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 July 2018 / Bradford C. Brown
Issue: 7801 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Will ‘Rule of Code’ usurp Rule of Law?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7801_brown

US lawyer Bradford C. Brown reflects on the decentralisation of law & the rise of the legal services business

  • Building a law business as opposed to a law practice.

For many years, lawyers have benefited from a structure that protects the practice of law from market forces—an ‘artificial moat’ around the practice of law, as described by legal thinker Ken Grady in his article, ‘Our confusion over what is a “lawyer”’ (The Algorithmic Society, 2018). Lawyering is a profession where in the early days, like an artisan, junior lawyers worked as apprentices to learn the craft under a seasoned lawyer, which created the notion of a guild. Inward facing Bar associations formed as fraternities of trades people, that—along with state licensing—limited competition.

Gradually, the law profession began requiring different skill sets as firms globalised into more businesslike structures. Yet law firms are still restricted by the rules that govern the profession of law, for example, those governing how a lawyer or law firm can market or advertise. Major

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll