header-logo header-logo

Will the ‘Scale-up’ visa make a difference?

02 September 2022
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Employment
printer mail-detail
The Home Office has launched a ‘Scale-up’ visa route to help businesses recruit highly skilled employees

The two-year visa, available from 22 August, is aimed at ‘Scale-ups’―young, fast-growing, innovation-driven companies, as opposed to ‘start-ups’, which are recently established companies with potential to grow. To qualify, scale-ups should have a turnover or growth rate of more than 20% for the past three years and have at least ten employees at the start of the three-year period.

According to employment and immigration lawyer Gillian McKearney, senior associate, Fieldfisher, the individual will need to be sponsored for the first six months only and must be in a highly skilled role, earning at least £33,000 per year and at least £10.58 per hour.

Joanna Hunt, head of immigration at Fieldfisher, said: ‘With the headlines still dominated by stories of industry sectors struggling to source talent, the news of another launch of a new visa by the government would appear to offer some welcome relief.

‘However, the Scale-up visa is unlikely to have a major impact on companies facing recruitment challenges, particularly those who need to recruit low skilled workers.’

Hunt said the application process would be ‘less onerous’ than other sponsor licence applications but was still ‘a time and cost commitment which inhibits how responsive an employer can be when they have a new candidate they want to hire.

‘The other big issue with the scale up visa is that it will allow a visa holder to become “unsponsored” within six months, meaning they can freely move to any other employer.

‘It is also likely to mean a greater use of clawback clauses in employment contracts by employers to try and recoup visa costs from workers who leave a business early to try and incentivise them to stay. But the increased use of clawbacks is controversial as it could lead to workers being exploited by underhand employers.’
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll