header-logo header-logo

30 October 2015 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Will they or won’t they?

web_mason_1

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska report on some recent wills & probate cases

“Your will can be ignored” screamed The Telegraph after judgment was handed down in the recent case of Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797, [2015] All ER (D) 290 (Jul) in which the deceased’s daughter was awarded a substantial sum from the deceased’s estate despite an express provision in the will that her daughter should not benefit. The media overstated the issue, but nevertheless the case serves as a reminder of incursions on testamentary freedom available under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975). Chekov v Fryer [2015] EWHC 1642 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 303 (Jun) provides another example, this time enabling a former wife who had agreed a divorce award on the basis that she could not subsequently claim from her former husband’s estate on death, to do just that, following a period of reconciliation prior to his death.

Chekov v Fryer

Mr and Mrs Fryer divorced in 1981. The divorce order contained

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll