header-logo header-logo

15 July 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Willing & able

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason examine recent wills & probate decisions

  • Davies and another v Davies : an appeal of a proprietary estoppel decision.
  • Hamilton v Hamilton : High Court considers the question of whether assets held in a Liechtenstein Foundation in fact formed part of the deceased’s estate such as to be distributed under the terms of his will.

Davies and another v Davies [2016] EWCA Civ 463, [2016] All ER (D) 09 (Jun), deals with an appeal of a proprietary estoppel decision. The claimant (C) worked intermittently on her parents’ dairy farm throughout her adult life. She did so for little or no pay, working long and anti-social hours and giving up a well-paid career. C did so on the expectation that she would inherit all or part of farm and/or farm business. Her parents made various promises to this effect throughout the period 1985 to 2008.

C made a successful claim based on proprietary estoppel, although the court at first instance rejected her claim for the whole farm but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll