header-logo header-logo

05 December 2014
Issue: 7633 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Wills

Loring and others v The Woodland Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1314, [2014] All ER (D) 198 (Oct)

A will had been made which left a gift of the deceased’s unused nil-rate band for inheritance tax purposes to her family with the residuary left to the defendant charity. The executors successfully claimed under s 8A(3) of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 for the surviving spouse increase in the nil-rate band. A dispute arose between the executors and the charity as to whether, under the terms of the will, the increased nil-rate band increased the value of the legacy to the family. The judge gave an interpretation of the relevant clause of the will that favoured the family. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the charity’s appeal as, on the true construction of the will together with s 8A(3), the increase in the nil-rate band had resulted in an increase in the size of the gift to the family.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll