header-logo header-logo

Wills claims triple

07 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Disputes over wills have tripled in the past year, partly due to the rise of “DIY” executors and trustees.

There were 368 legal claims against executors in 2013, compared to 107 in the previous year, according to High Court figures. Claims included theft of assets, fraudulent distribution of assets and favouring certain beneficiaries above others.

Law firm Hugh James, which obtained the figures, said the use of family members as “DIY” executors was becoming more common but carried substantial problems. It said executors can be held responsible for errors made in the distribution of assets, can face legal claims from beneficiaries and can be forced to compensate the beneficiary out of their own pocket.

The increase in house prices means there is more at stake, increasing the temptation for dishonest executors. Lay executors have also been caught out purposely misinterpreting the will in order to favour a particular beneficiary.

Matthew Evans, partner at Hugh James, says: “Amateur executors may not want the money of the deceased to go outside of their immediate family and so take matters in their own hands distributing the assets as they see fit, even if that means they are acting contrary to their responsibilities as a legal executor.

“Ignorance of the law can be a stumbling block for lay executors. Mistakes can be made due to inexperience, such as delaying the sale of assets, which can cause a decline in value. In other cases, it’s not just ignorance of the law, but greed that is the problem.”

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll