header-logo header-logo

17 July 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills overturned

Wills are not always black & white, says Michael Tringham

Australian courts are demonstrating a propensity for changing legacies following Family Provision Applications. Michael Klatt of Brisbane law firm Mullins comments on two recent cases in which the court considers “the applicant’s financial position, the size and nature of the deceased’s estate, the totality of the relationship between the deceased and other persons who have a claim upon his or her bounty”.

In Underwood v Underwood the Supreme Court of Queensland considered an application by a de-facto spouse and three of the deceased’s four adult children.

The estate included an interest in a family-owned business. While none of the deceased’s children had shown any interest in the business, his nephews had worked in it since they were apprentices, were his business partners, and had been effectively conducting the business since 1988. The deceased’s interest in the business and its real property was left entirely to his nephews.

The remaining assets were shared between members of the deceased’s immediate family and his de facto spouse. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll