header-logo header-logo

Wilsher revisited

21 July 2017 / David Levy
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

What constitute ‘basic requirements’ in respect of history & clinical examination? Dr David Levy considers the evidence

  • Wilsher established that a hospital doctor should be judged by the standard of care appropriate to the post.
  • FB has distinguished doctors’ generic core skills of history taking and clinical examination.

In 2003, 25 years after Martin Wilsher was born prematurely at the Princess Alexandra Hospital Harlow, a 13-month-old infant, FB, was admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of the same hospital. Wilsher developed retinopathy of prematurity. Whereas his claim against the hospital Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] AC 1074 was rejected by the House of Lords on causation, breach—specifically the standards of care provided by trainee doctors—was a principal focus of the arguments in the Court of Appeal ( Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1987] QB 730). In FB v Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 334 causation was not at issue. However, in upholding FB’s appeal, important dicta were made on judicial expectations of trainee doctors working in the NHS.

FB

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll