header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017 / David Levy
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Wilsher revisited

What constitute ‘basic requirements’ in respect of history & clinical examination? Dr David Levy considers the evidence

  • Wilsher established that a hospital doctor should be judged by the standard of care appropriate to the post.
  • FB has distinguished doctors’ generic core skills of history taking and clinical examination.

In 2003, 25 years after Martin Wilsher was born prematurely at the Princess Alexandra Hospital Harlow, a 13-month-old infant, FB, was admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of the same hospital. Wilsher developed retinopathy of prematurity. Whereas his claim against the hospital Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] AC 1074 was rejected by the House of Lords on causation, breach—specifically the standards of care provided by trainee doctors—was a principal focus of the arguments in the Court of Appeal ( Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1987] QB 730). In FB v Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 334 causation was not at issue. However, in upholding FB’s appeal, important dicta were made on judicial expectations of trainee doctors working in the NHS.

FB

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll