header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017 / David Levy
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Wilsher revisited

What constitute ‘basic requirements’ in respect of history & clinical examination? Dr David Levy considers the evidence

  • Wilsher established that a hospital doctor should be judged by the standard of care appropriate to the post.
  • FB has distinguished doctors’ generic core skills of history taking and clinical examination.

In 2003, 25 years after Martin Wilsher was born prematurely at the Princess Alexandra Hospital Harlow, a 13-month-old infant, FB, was admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of the same hospital. Wilsher developed retinopathy of prematurity. Whereas his claim against the hospital Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] AC 1074 was rejected by the House of Lords on causation, breach—specifically the standards of care provided by trainee doctors—was a principal focus of the arguments in the Court of Appeal ( Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1987] QB 730). In FB v Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 334 causation was not at issue. However, in upholding FB’s appeal, important dicta were made on judicial expectations of trainee doctors working in the NHS.

FB

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll