header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Winding-up foreign companies

Janna Purdie looks at the principles courts apply when determining whether or not to exercise their winding up jurisdiction

Winding up foreign companies

Refs: OJSC ANK Yugraneft, Millhouse and Sibir [2008] All ER (D) 311 (Oct)

In a judgment of interest in the current economic climate, the Commercial Court has set out the principles applicable in determining whether or not it may exercise its jurisdiction to wind-up a foreign company in the English courts.

Facts of the case

Refs: OJSC Oil Company v Abramovich [2008] All ER (D) 299 (Oct)

The case links through to the OJSC Oil Company v Abramovich case in which judgment was handed down on the same day. That case effectively decided the outcome of this one but the judge considered that he should continue to deal with it as it was a free standing application.

In this case, the applicants sought an order to set aside the appointment of the provisional liquidator of Yugraneft, a declaration that the court would decline to exercise its insolvency jurisdiction and an order dismissing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll