header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Winding-up foreign companies

Janna Purdie looks at the principles courts apply when determining whether or not to exercise their winding up jurisdiction

Winding up foreign companies

Refs: OJSC ANK Yugraneft, Millhouse and Sibir [2008] All ER (D) 311 (Oct)

In a judgment of interest in the current economic climate, the Commercial Court has set out the principles applicable in determining whether or not it may exercise its jurisdiction to wind-up a foreign company in the English courts.

Facts of the case

Refs: OJSC Oil Company v Abramovich [2008] All ER (D) 299 (Oct)

The case links through to the OJSC Oil Company v Abramovich case in which judgment was handed down on the same day. That case effectively decided the outcome of this one but the judge considered that he should continue to deal with it as it was a free standing application.

In this case, the applicants sought an order to set aside the appointment of the provisional liquidator of Yugraneft, a declaration that the court would decline to exercise its insolvency jurisdiction and an order dismissing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll