header-logo header-logo

Window on the stars

22 November 2007 / Grant Howell
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

How private should the family courts be? asks Grant Howell

The media spotlight focused on the  country’s divorce process in October, when the McCartneys sat down with their lawyers to thrash out agreement on ancillary relief claims linked to their divorce. The question of privacy in family courts is a topical one. There is no doubt that the current position is confused. Where matters are dealt with in either the county court or the High Court, they are protected from public scrutiny yet they become open to both public and press—subject to reporting restrictions at judicial discretion—should they reach either the Court of Appeal or House of Lords.

LACK OF TRANSPARENCY

There has also been much recent debate centred upon consultation papers issued by the government. The latest, Confidence and Confidentiality: Openness in Family Courts—A New Approach (CP 10/07), was published on 20 June 2007. The focus here is on matters relating to children, but the consultation paper recognises the family courts’ role in resolving financial issues and the far-reaching effects of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll