header-logo header-logo

A winning formula

17 January 2014 / Daniel Robinson , Nathaniel Duckworth
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
web_duckworthrobinson

Is it now easier for landlords to obtain possession from assured shorthold tenants? Nathaniel Duckworth & Daniel Robinson report

Assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs) were intended to provide landlords with a letting mechanism under which they could recover possession quickly and simply by giving notice, rather than having to establish any of the fault-based grounds for possession, such as the existence of rent arrears. They were a considerable inroad into security of tenure for residential tenants. Since 28 February 1997, the default position has been that any residential tenancy is an AST unless (among other exceptions) the parties expressly agree it is to be an assured tenancy, under which the landlord cannot recover possession simply by giving notice.

Landlords are, however, frequently frustrated by the process of recovering possession from well-advised—or, as many landlords would describe them, obstinate and opportunistic—AST tenants. Even with the accelerated possession procedure—which allows landlords to obtain a possession order without a hearing—it can take weeks to obtain a possession order and a further month or more to obtain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll