header-logo header-logo

Winning in the court of public opinion

06 November 2024
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Seven out of ten litigators (72%) say media scrutiny of courtroom proceedings has increased in the past decade, according to a report published this week, ‘Reputation in litigation’

This is heightening client stress—three-quarters of litigators say their clients are concerned about reputational damage resulting from media coverage of their case. Moreover, three-quarters of litigants say public relations strategy is ‘sometimes’ or ‘frequently’ considered alongside the broader litigation strategy.

In terms of reputation management, clients perceive the biggest threat to be losing control of the narrative—this, along with rumour, speculation on social media and inaccurate reporting are considered more of a threat than a leak of confidential information. Asked whether potential reputational consequences have ever stopped a client from pursuing litigation despite a ‘watertight’ case, 57% of litigators said ‘yes’, and a further 6% said ‘almost’.

Despite the importance to clients of reputation management, however, only 16% of litigators ‘frequently’ seek specialist litigation PR advice, while 63% ‘never’ or ‘infrequently’ do so. 

The report, published by communications and litigation support firm Infinite Global this week, is based on a survey of more than 1,000 Chambers-ranked litigation and defamation practitioners in the UK in the second half of this year.

Ryan McSharry, director and head of litigation PR (UK) at Infinite Global, said: ‘Reputation has become a decisive factor.

‘Litigators have a clear understanding of the need to balance legal objectives with public perception. Yet, despite concern regarding reputational risk and wide acknowledgement of rising media scrutiny during court proceedings, media expertise and relationships are not common. This can result in not just heightened risk, but also missed opportunities.

‘Instead of viewing PR as an obligation per court directives or open justice requests, there are a full range of tactics that can be employed to proactively shape the narrative, manage public perception and counteract misinformation.’

Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll