header-logo header-logo

01 January 2010
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Witness expenses

Is there any limit on the expenses which can be awarded against an unsuccessful party?

Is there any limit on the expenses which can be awarded against an unsuccessful party for the travelling and accommodation expenses etc incurred by the successful party or its witnesses in attending a hearing? I have the cost of foreign travel particularly in mind.

No, subject to reasonableness and proportionality. Dealing with a case justly which parties are enjoined to do by CPR 1.1 involves, so far as practicable, saving expense and, in relation to proportionality, taking into account the amount of money involved in the claim, the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues and the financial position of each party.

These principles and the requirement for the parties to cooperate apply to costs as to every other aspect of a case and mean that consideration should be given to telephone or video-link evidence where a witness’s attendance at court would be expensive.

The likely expenses should also be made clear to the other side as early

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll