header-logo header-logo

Witness expenses

01 January 2010
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Is there any limit on the expenses which can be awarded against an unsuccessful party?

Is there any limit on the expenses which can be awarded against an unsuccessful party for the travelling and accommodation expenses etc incurred by the successful party or its witnesses in attending a hearing? I have the cost of foreign travel particularly in mind.

No, subject to reasonableness and proportionality. Dealing with a case justly which parties are enjoined to do by CPR 1.1 involves, so far as practicable, saving expense and, in relation to proportionality, taking into account the amount of money involved in the claim, the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues and the financial position of each party.

These principles and the requirement for the parties to cooperate apply to costs as to every other aspect of a case and mean that consideration should be given to telephone or video-link evidence where a witness’s attendance at court would be expensive.

The likely expenses should also be made clear to the other side as early

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll