header-logo header-logo

Witness expenses

01 January 2010
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Is there any limit on the expenses which can be awarded against an unsuccessful party?

Is there any limit on the expenses which can be awarded against an unsuccessful party for the travelling and accommodation expenses etc incurred by the successful party or its witnesses in attending a hearing? I have the cost of foreign travel particularly in mind.

No, subject to reasonableness and proportionality. Dealing with a case justly which parties are enjoined to do by CPR 1.1 involves, so far as practicable, saving expense and, in relation to proportionality, taking into account the amount of money involved in the claim, the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues and the financial position of each party.

These principles and the requirement for the parties to cooperate apply to costs as to every other aspect of a case and mean that consideration should be given to telephone or video-link evidence where a witness’s attendance at court would be expensive.

The likely expenses should also be made clear to the other side as early

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll