header-logo header-logo

Witness fee review

11 March 2010
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice is reviewing expert witness rates for legal aid work, with a view to introducing fixed fees and hourly rates.

A working group is being set up to carry out the review, Analysis of expert Witness Fees. The group will provide further analysis of the work of experts, and follows on from the government consultation, Legal Aid: Funding Reforms, which first mooted the idea of fixed hourly rates and fees.

Last year, £205.4m of legal aid funds went towards disbursements, an increase of £13.4m from 2007–8. 

In a survey of delegates attending Bond Solon’s annual expert witness conference in November, 41% of expert witnesses who work in legal aid said they would continue if hourly rates went down, while 59% said they would stop.

Mark Solon, solicitor of Bond Solon Training, says:  “Expert witnesses are not like solicitors and barristers, many of whom roll over and accept legal aid cuts. Experts have a day job and do expert witness work to create a lucrative secondary source of income.

“The indications are that many will prefer the quiet life of their own work than an increasingly dangerous fore into litigation with potential civil liability and disciplinary action. The cuts may mean the poor litigant will get the poor expert.”

Issue: 7408 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll