header-logo header-logo

Witness fee review

11 March 2010
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice is reviewing expert witness rates for legal aid work, with a view to introducing fixed fees and hourly rates.

A working group is being set up to carry out the review, Analysis of expert Witness Fees. The group will provide further analysis of the work of experts, and follows on from the government consultation, Legal Aid: Funding Reforms, which first mooted the idea of fixed hourly rates and fees.

Last year, £205.4m of legal aid funds went towards disbursements, an increase of £13.4m from 2007–8. 

In a survey of delegates attending Bond Solon’s annual expert witness conference in November, 41% of expert witnesses who work in legal aid said they would continue if hourly rates went down, while 59% said they would stop.

Mark Solon, solicitor of Bond Solon Training, says:  “Expert witnesses are not like solicitors and barristers, many of whom roll over and accept legal aid cuts. Experts have a day job and do expert witness work to create a lucrative secondary source of income.

“The indications are that many will prefer the quiet life of their own work than an increasingly dangerous fore into litigation with potential civil liability and disciplinary action. The cuts may mean the poor litigant will get the poor expert.”

Issue: 7408 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll