header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Witness fee review

The Ministry of Justice is reviewing expert witness rates for legal aid work, with a view to introducing fixed fees and hourly rates.

A working group is being set up to carry out the review, Analysis of expert Witness Fees. The group will provide further analysis of the work of experts, and follows on from the government consultation, Legal Aid: Funding Reforms, which first mooted the idea of fixed hourly rates and fees.

Last year, £205.4m of legal aid funds went towards disbursements, an increase of £13.4m from 2007–8. 

In a survey of delegates attending Bond Solon’s annual expert witness conference in November, 41% of expert witnesses who work in legal aid said they would continue if hourly rates went down, while 59% said they would stop.

Mark Solon, solicitor of Bond Solon Training, says:  “Expert witnesses are not like solicitors and barristers, many of whom roll over and accept legal aid cuts. Experts have a day job and do expert witness work to create a lucrative secondary source of income.

“The indications are that many will prefer the quiet life of their own work than an increasingly dangerous fore into litigation with potential civil liability and disciplinary action. The cuts may mean the poor litigant will get the poor expert.”

Issue: 7408 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll