header-logo header-logo

Witness fee review

11 March 2010
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice is reviewing expert witness rates for legal aid work, with a view to introducing fixed fees and hourly rates.

A working group is being set up to carry out the review, Analysis of expert Witness Fees. The group will provide further analysis of the work of experts, and follows on from the government consultation, Legal Aid: Funding Reforms, which first mooted the idea of fixed hourly rates and fees.

Last year, £205.4m of legal aid funds went towards disbursements, an increase of £13.4m from 2007–8. 

In a survey of delegates attending Bond Solon’s annual expert witness conference in November, 41% of expert witnesses who work in legal aid said they would continue if hourly rates went down, while 59% said they would stop.

Mark Solon, solicitor of Bond Solon Training, says:  “Expert witnesses are not like solicitors and barristers, many of whom roll over and accept legal aid cuts. Experts have a day job and do expert witness work to create a lucrative secondary source of income.

“The indications are that many will prefer the quiet life of their own work than an increasingly dangerous fore into litigation with potential civil liability and disciplinary action. The cuts may mean the poor litigant will get the poor expert.”

Issue: 7408 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll