header-logo header-logo

Work doesn’t pay: civil legal aid providers at breaking point

22 May 2024
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Civil legal aid work is loss-making for the majority of providers, according to a devastating research paper published this week

The study, ‘Research on the sustainability of legal aid’, was commissioned by the Law Society and conducted by Frontier Economics with housing and family legal aid lawyers in not-for-profits and private practice. It found 82% of providers were making a loss from civil legal aid.

More specifically, all housing legal aid providers in the sample were loss-making from their civil legal aid work, including all private sector solicitors offering housing work.

It found 47% of family legal aid providers were loss-making. All not-for-profit providers sampled in both areas of law were making a loss.

One lawyer told the researchers: ‘We simply can’t afford to do private family legal aid.’ Another said: ‘It’s an exercise in withering on the vine. We’re all quite old. I look at it and think, in ten years’ time there won’t be any legal aid work.’

Civil legal aid fees have not increased since the 1990s and were cut in 2011 by 10%. According to the Law Society, this represents a real terms reduction of 90% since 1996.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘This research reveals an untenable situation where reductions in fee levels by successive governments mean fee-earning staff cannot even recover the costs of providing legal aid, let alone generate a profit to make the organisation sustainable.

‘Those who remain in the market are only able to do so by cross-subsidising from other areas and relying on the goodwill of staff to regularly work overtime, leading to real difficulties with recruitment and retention—especially at senior levels of the profession. Others are taking the decision that legal aid work is simply no longer viable and exiting the market, leaving areas of the country with no legal aid provision at all.

‘This is just not sustainable and is resulting in massive market exit, with advice deserts growing across the country. It is a significant concern when a city the size of Liverpool struggles to sustain housing provision and the family courts are flooded with litigants in person. These figures provide clear evidence of the reasons why.’

Emmerson urged the Ministry of Justice, which is currently conducting the Civil Legal Aid Review, to set fee rates at a ‘realistic and sustainable level’.

Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll