header-logo header-logo

A work in progress (2)

20 March 2014 / David Burrows
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

In his exclusive online series David Burrows continues to puts the new family court under scrutiny & assesses its ability to deliver justice

These articles on the family court were planned at the turn of the year. It was thought then—not unreasonably at that stage—that a family court, intended to be in operation in April 2014, would have well-defined regulatory contours by March 2014.

We have primary legislation in place: Crime and Courts Act 2013, Sch 10 brings in the family court, and the Children and Families Act 2014 has royal assent (13 March 2014). For the family court, secondary legislation is still limited to two sets of Family Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2014 (SI Nos 524 and 667 both of 2014) laid before Parliament respectively on 10 and 18 March 2014. We have various “views” from the window of Sir James Munby P’s office (chambers). In All change (again), Geraldine Morris speculated as to what is to happen with the new court (eg its structure, children proceedings, court fees, marital agreements (a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll