header-logo header-logo

25 September 2015 / Paul Hughes , Paul Hughes
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Work in progress

nlj_7669_hughes

Construction adjudication is to be introduced in Ireland, Paul Hughes explains

In Ireland construction disputes are normally resolved by arbitration, conciliation, mediation or litigation. However, pursuant to the provisions of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 (the Act) adjudication will be introduced into Irish law this year. The legislation does not demand that the parties take their dispute to adjudication. The parties are at liberty not to accept the adjudicator’s decision, albeit they are bound by the decision temporarily at least. In broad terms the adjudication process as set out in the Irish legislation is similar to the adjudication legislation in the UK. However, the UK legislation applies to a dispute which includes “any difference”, whereas, the Irish legislation only applies to a “payment dispute”.

Disputes falling within the scope of the Act

The Act does not affect every contract. To that extent there are a number of hurdles which must be overcome before any attempt at adjudication is made. First, there must be an enforceable construction contract and second, the dispute must relate to payment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll