header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Working time?

Ian Smith tackles the thorny issue of holidays & accrual rights

The decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Zentralarbeitsreibsrat der Tirols v Land Tirol: C-486/08 [2010] IRLR 631, though formally taken under the directives on part-time and fixed-term working, involves a point of significance to working time law on holidays; the point is a narrow one, applying to one specific factual possibility, but could lead to one of the regulations on domestic working time having to be read in the light of it.

Legality

The case concerned three queries as to the legality of certain Austrian labour laws on hospital workers. The third concerned holiday entitlements where a worker moves from full-time to part-time working, part of the way through the holiday year. The Austrian provision stated that in such a case, if the worker had untaken leave from the full-time working it could be pro-rated down to the part-time level if then taken while working part-time. The ECJ held that this offended the protection given by the Part-time Worker Directive 99/23

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll