header-logo header-logo

X-rated passports?

25 February 2022 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail
73194
Gender identity in the spotlight: Nicholas Dobson analyses the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Elan-Cane
  • Neither the European Convention on Human Rights nor the Human Rights Act 1998 in domestic law impose any current obligation for the secretary of state to issue an X-marked, gender-neutral passport.

According to the Anglican clergyman and essayist Sydney Smith (1771–1845), ‘there are three sexes—men, women, and clergymen.’ However, the past being ‘a foreign country’ where they ‘do things differently’, sex and gender are more complex nowadays. For, as the World Health Organization indicates, while ‘gender identity refers to a person’s deeply felt, internal and individual experience of gender’, this ‘may or may not correspond to the person’s physiology or designated sex at birth.’

So how does UK law treat transgender people, ie those having a gender different from their birth record? Under s 7(1) of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) a person has a gender reassignment protected characteristic in the light of a process (or part process) ‘for the purpose of reassigning the person’s sex by changing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll