header-logo header-logo

You may have to be mad to work here

05 March 2009 / Rob Mccreath
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Employment , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rob McCreath on the fallout from a high–octane workplace

The workplace is for robust, healthy people, yes? Ill people, especially mentally ill people, should be cared for elsewhere, somewhere out of sight. They should certainly not be recruited and if they slip through the nets craftily set up by the HR department, or if they become ill during employment, they should be discreetly managed out. This is essentially the approach taken by most UK employers. Many would say, in a tough world, it makes good business sense.

But consider this: on average, employers should expect to find that at any one time nearly one in six of their workforce is affected by a mental health condition, such as depression or anxiety. The proportion rises to over one in five if alcohol and drug dependence are also included.

Legal risks

Undoubtedly there are legal risks for employers arising from mental illness in the workplace. Personal injury claims arising where stressful working conditions foreseeably cause psychiatric injury routinely yield

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll