header-logo header-logo

You may have to be mad to work here

05 March 2009 / Rob Mccreath
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Employment , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rob McCreath on the fallout from a high–octane workplace

The workplace is for robust, healthy people, yes? Ill people, especially mentally ill people, should be cared for elsewhere, somewhere out of sight. They should certainly not be recruited and if they slip through the nets craftily set up by the HR department, or if they become ill during employment, they should be discreetly managed out. This is essentially the approach taken by most UK employers. Many would say, in a tough world, it makes good business sense.

But consider this: on average, employers should expect to find that at any one time nearly one in six of their workforce is affected by a mental health condition, such as depression or anxiety. The proportion rises to over one in five if alcohol and drug dependence are also included.

Legal risks

Undoubtedly there are legal risks for employers arising from mental illness in the workplace. Personal injury claims arising where stressful working conditions foreseeably cause psychiatric injury routinely yield

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll