header-logo header-logo

12 September 2013 / Stephen Mason
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Is your number up?

Stephen Mason & Nicholas Bohm take issue with the PIN requirements of Santander

Santander UK plc has recently imposed on its UK banking customers the requirement that the personal identity number (PIN) for their accounts must be unique. This is coupled with a prohibition against the recording of the PIN: a combination which we believe places customers in such difficulty that the terms are unfair.

A unique PIN

Clause 9.7(k) of Santander’s General Terms and Conditions Current Accounts and Savings Accounts (effective from 1 January 2013) provides that the customer must “take reasonable steps to keep your PIN or Personal Security Details unique to the accounts that you hold with us”. Although it is not clear what “reasonable steps” the customer must take, the PIN must be unique to the accounts that the customer holds with Santander.

Memory

There is a considerable amount of published research on the topic of memory, and the human need to write down complex passwords (for a general introduction, see Wendy Moncur and Dr Grégory Leplâtre, “PINs, passwords

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll