header-logo header-logo

Is your number up?

12 September 2013 / Stephen Mason
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Stephen Mason & Nicholas Bohm take issue with the PIN requirements of Santander

Santander UK plc has recently imposed on its UK banking customers the requirement that the personal identity number (PIN) for their accounts must be unique. This is coupled with a prohibition against the recording of the PIN: a combination which we believe places customers in such difficulty that the terms are unfair.

A unique PIN

Clause 9.7(k) of Santander’s General Terms and Conditions Current Accounts and Savings Accounts (effective from 1 January 2013) provides that the customer must “take reasonable steps to keep your PIN or Personal Security Details unique to the accounts that you hold with us”. Although it is not clear what “reasonable steps” the customer must take, the PIN must be unique to the accounts that the customer holds with Santander.

Memory

There is a considerable amount of published research on the topic of memory, and the human need to write down complex passwords (for a general introduction, see Wendy Moncur and Dr Grégory Leplâtre, “PINs, passwords

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll