header-logo header-logo

08 December 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8052 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Zander’s reflections: 8 December 2023

150572
Michael Zander KC on how he helped to derail Lord Carter’s proposed sentencing reforms

In 2008, although I had never previously written about sentencing, I did my best to help derail proposals for reform of sentencing put forward by Lord Carter of Coles in his report, ‘Securing the Future— Proposals for the Efficient and Sustainable Use of Custody in England and Wales’ (December 2007), which I described in print as ‘a contender for the title of Worst Report of Recent Years’ (‘Which way to go?’, 158 NLJ 869).

Carter’s report recommended the introduction of a US-style structured sentencing framework based on a grid aimed at a drastic reduction of judicial discretion. There had been no call for evidence, no consultation paper and the report made no reference to the considerable literature on the subject. No one on the Sentencing Advisory Panel or the Sentencing Guidelines Council had been asked for their opinion. There was no list of those who had been consulted.

Carter’s report recommended the setting up

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll