header-logo header-logo

02 February 2024 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Zander’s reflections: 2 February 2024

156460
Michael Zander KC on why the correction of miscarriages of justice is so slow…

Looking a few days ago among my papers, I happened upon something that echoes the story captured so powerfully by ITV’s Mr Bates vs The Post Office.

In April 1992, as a member of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, I sent the chairman, Lord Runciman, an eight-page memo asking that it be circulated to fellow commission members. The memo was entitled ‘Re Miscarriages of Justice’. It raised half-a-dozen different issues, starting with ‘CPS HQ “sitting on” information relevant to a miscarriage of justice’ and ‘C3 of the Home Office are also prone to excessive delay’.

Home Office Guidance to Chief Officers on Police and Discipline Procedures stated that when an investigation brought to light material suggesting that a prosecution was unsafe or unfounded, ‘the chief officer should immediately draw the relevant material to the attention of the Crown Prosecution Service (Headquarters)’ (para 4.29).

If something has to be reported immediately to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll