header-logo header-logo

13 October 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Zander’s reflections: The accounts of the Inns of Court

142346
Michael Zander on why barristers have the legal right to ask to see the accounts

In 1965, 58 years ago, I wrote an article urging reform of the system requiring Bar students to eat dinners in the Inn as part of the qualifying process (The Lawyer, 1965, Vol.8, Nos 2&3, pp21-27. It was that little journal’s last issue). The article proposed ways in which the dining requirement could be turned into a meaningful educational experience. However, those proposals are not my topic here.

I acknowledged that what I was proposing would require some expenditure, and that I did not know whether the Inns could afford it because they did not publish their accounts. That remains the position today. Historical accounts can be accessed, but a barrister will only have access to his or her Inns’ modern-day accounts if they are members of the Inn’s Bench Finance Committee.

Shrouded in mystery

In 1854, the Royal Commission on the Inns of Court reported extensively on their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll