header-logo header-logo

Zander’s reflections: The accounts of the Inns of Court

13 October 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
142346
Michael Zander on why barristers have the legal right to ask to see the accounts

In 1965, 58 years ago, I wrote an article urging reform of the system requiring Bar students to eat dinners in the Inn as part of the qualifying process (The Lawyer, 1965, Vol.8, Nos 2&3, pp21-27. It was that little journal’s last issue). The article proposed ways in which the dining requirement could be turned into a meaningful educational experience. However, those proposals are not my topic here.

I acknowledged that what I was proposing would require some expenditure, and that I did not know whether the Inns could afford it because they did not publish their accounts. That remains the position today. Historical accounts can be accessed, but a barrister will only have access to his or her Inns’ modern-day accounts if they are members of the Inn’s Bench Finance Committee.

Shrouded in mystery

In 1854, the Royal Commission on the Inns of Court reported extensively on their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll