header-logo header-logo

08 August 2014 / Hester Jewitt
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Zeroing in

specialist_employment_jewitt

Hester Jewitt examines government plans to crack down on the abuse of zero hours contracts

Emotions around zero hours contracts have run high over the last year. For businesses, zero hours contracts are a valuable tool in the current market. While their flexibility also suits some individuals, it leaves others open to exploitation. To understand the issues associated with zero hours contracts, the business secretary, Vince Cable, launched a formal consultation on 19 December 2013. The consultation focused on:

  • exclusivity clauses; and
  • the lack of transparency on the terms, conditions and consequences of zero hours contracts.

The consultation closed on 13 March 2014 with more than 36,000 responses.

Government plans

On 25 June 2014, the government announced its response to the consultation process: to ban the use of exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts; to take steps to address their lack of transparency; and to consult further on how to prevent rogue employers evading the exclusivity ban.

The changes will be introduced through the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill 2014-15, which includes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll