header-logo header-logo

08 August 2014 / Hester Jewitt
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Zeroing in

specialist_employment_jewitt

Hester Jewitt examines government plans to crack down on the abuse of zero hours contracts

Emotions around zero hours contracts have run high over the last year. For businesses, zero hours contracts are a valuable tool in the current market. While their flexibility also suits some individuals, it leaves others open to exploitation. To understand the issues associated with zero hours contracts, the business secretary, Vince Cable, launched a formal consultation on 19 December 2013. The consultation focused on:

  • exclusivity clauses; and
  • the lack of transparency on the terms, conditions and consequences of zero hours contracts.

The consultation closed on 13 March 2014 with more than 36,000 responses.

Government plans

On 25 June 2014, the government announced its response to the consultation process: to ban the use of exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts; to take steps to address their lack of transparency; and to consult further on how to prevent rogue employers evading the exclusivity ban.

The changes will be introduced through the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill 2014-15, which includes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll