header-logo header-logo

Zeroing in

08 August 2014 / Hester Jewitt
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
specialist_employment_jewitt

Hester Jewitt examines government plans to crack down on the abuse of zero hours contracts

Emotions around zero hours contracts have run high over the last year. For businesses, zero hours contracts are a valuable tool in the current market. While their flexibility also suits some individuals, it leaves others open to exploitation. To understand the issues associated with zero hours contracts, the business secretary, Vince Cable, launched a formal consultation on 19 December 2013. The consultation focused on:

  • exclusivity clauses; and
  • the lack of transparency on the terms, conditions and consequences of zero hours contracts.

The consultation closed on 13 March 2014 with more than 36,000 responses.

Government plans

On 25 June 2014, the government announced its response to the consultation process: to ban the use of exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts; to take steps to address their lack of transparency; and to consult further on how to prevent rogue employers evading the exclusivity ban.

The changes will be introduced through the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill 2014-15, which includes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll