header-logo header-logo

26 July 2020
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Zoom witnesses fine for wills

Remotely witnessed wills will be deemed legal due to COVID-19 social distancing requirements, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said

A will must be made ‘in the presence of’ at least two witnesses in order to be valid, in England and Wales. During the pandemic, some people who were shielding or isolating had their wills witnesses remotely used video link software―raising questions about the legal validity.

However, the MoJ has announced that a statutory instrument will be laid in September and will have retrospective effect to 1 January 2020, amending the Wills Act 1837 to stipulate that ‘presence’ may be virtual or physical.  

Nicholas Bevan, senior associate, Solicitors Title, who has previously written in NLJ that witnessing and executing wills online has always been legal therefore there was no need for a rule change, said: ‘The proposed legislation unblocks the logjam caused by the legal profession’s failure to apply the law.

‘Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837 does not insist on the physical “presence” of a testamentary witness, any more than it stipulates that “writing” must be handwriting or type.’ He pointed out that the government announcement expressly declares that ‘none of the existing relevant requirements are changed by the new law’.

Welcoming the announcement, Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘Both probate professionals and the public will need greater clarity on when remote witnessing is appropriate and what to do in exceptional circumstances.’

Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) CEO Linda Ford said practitioners had reported ‘significant difficulties with witnessing wills’ and emphasised that the legislation must ‘recognise the risks of duress, undue influence and fraud, and build safeguards into any such new regime.

‘Unfortunately, wills can bring out the worst in people and the retrospective nature of the change, whilst providing additional assurances for those who have already made their wills over the lockdown period, could make some cases particularly fraught.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll