header-logo header-logo

Zoom witnesses fine for wills

26 July 2020
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Remotely witnessed wills will be deemed legal due to COVID-19 social distancing requirements, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said

A will must be made ‘in the presence of’ at least two witnesses in order to be valid, in England and Wales. During the pandemic, some people who were shielding or isolating had their wills witnesses remotely used video link software―raising questions about the legal validity.

However, the MoJ has announced that a statutory instrument will be laid in September and will have retrospective effect to 1 January 2020, amending the Wills Act 1837 to stipulate that ‘presence’ may be virtual or physical.  

Nicholas Bevan, senior associate, Solicitors Title, who has previously written in NLJ that witnessing and executing wills online has always been legal therefore there was no need for a rule change, said: ‘The proposed legislation unblocks the logjam caused by the legal profession’s failure to apply the law.

‘Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837 does not insist on the physical “presence” of a testamentary witness, any more than it stipulates that “writing” must be handwriting or type.’ He pointed out that the government announcement expressly declares that ‘none of the existing relevant requirements are changed by the new law’.

Welcoming the announcement, Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘Both probate professionals and the public will need greater clarity on when remote witnessing is appropriate and what to do in exceptional circumstances.’

Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) CEO Linda Ford said practitioners had reported ‘significant difficulties with witnessing wills’ and emphasised that the legislation must ‘recognise the risks of duress, undue influence and fraud, and build safeguards into any such new regime.

‘Unfortunately, wills can bring out the worst in people and the retrospective nature of the change, whilst providing additional assurances for those who have already made their wills over the lockdown period, could make some cases particularly fraught.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll