Winrow v Hemphill and another company [2014] EWHC 3164 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 65 (Oct)
Cezar Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjne Dariusz Bogdan Niewinski v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal market (Trade Marks and Designs) T-39/13, [2014] All ER (D) 69 (Oct)
Re an application by Gloucestershire County Council for the committal to prison of Newman [2014] EWHC 3136 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 50 (Oct)
Henderson v All Around the World Recordings Ltd [2014] EWHC 3087 (IPEC), [2014] All ER (D) 98 (Oct)
Evans v Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2014] EWHC 3185 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 86 (Oct)
Is there still a requirement for dictation ...& how has it changed?
Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage
Will Home Office take opportunity to “clear the slate”?
Government taskforce to assess the possible impact of decision
MOVERS & SHAKERS
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires
Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on
Ellisons—Sarah Osborne
Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team
DWF—Chris Air
Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment
An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ
