header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 165, Issue 7640

13 February 2015
IN THIS ISSUE

Mosley v Google Inc and another [2015] EWHC 59 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 06 (Feb)

Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v Barrington Support Services Limited (Formerly Lawyers at Work Ltd) and another [2015] EWCA Civ 31, [2015] All ER (D) 31 (Feb)

Barking and Dagenham London Borough v SS [2014] EWHC 4436 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 07 (Feb)

MASM v MMAM and others [2015] EWCOP 3, [2015] All ER (D) 238 (Jan)

Re M (Children) (Republic of Ireland) (Child’s Objections) (Joinder of Children as parties to appeal) [2015] EWCA Civ 26, [2015] All ER (D) 03 (Feb)

Hutchinson v United Kingdom (App No 57592/08), [2015] All ER (D) 17 (Feb)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll