header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 157, Issue 7255

11 January 2007
IN THIS ISSUE

Re B (a Child) (Child support: Reduction of contact) [2006] EWCA Civ 1574, [2006] All ER (D) 327 (Nov):

Fraud Act 2006 (Commencement) Order 2006 (SI 2006/3200):

Bee v Jenson
[2006] EWHC 3359 (Comm), [2006] All ER (D) 352 (Dec)

Kris Gledhill responds to comments on the legitimacy of the offence of causing death by careless driving

In brief

Law Society v Adcock and another [2006] EWHC 3212 (admin), [2006] All ER (D) 322 (Dec)

In brief

The Law Commission wants to abolish the law of forfeiture for breach of covenant. Stuart Bridge explains why

R v Cain [2006] All ER (D) 113 (Dec):

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll