header-logo header-logo

david_dimambro

David di Mambro

Barrister

David di Mambro, Member Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) 2003-2009, co-opted from 2009-2013; Chairman of Part 36 Sub Committee 2011-2013. Upon standing down as co-opted member of CPRC, David remained a member of the Sub Committee, which was thereafter chaired by Edward Pepperall QC. David is a barrister and Chartered Arbitrator practising in Radcliffe Chambers, where he has a commercial and property practice. David is Senior Contributing Editor to the Civil Court Practice (The Green Book) and Editor-in Chief of the Caribbean Civil Court Practice.

Barrister

David di Mambro, Member Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) 2003-2009, co-opted from 2009-2013; Chairman of Part 36 Sub Committee 2011-2013. Upon standing down as co-opted member of CPRC, David remained a member of the Sub Committee, which was thereafter chaired by Edward Pepperall QC. David is a barrister and Chartered Arbitrator practising in Radcliffe Chambers, where he has a commercial and property practice. David is Senior Contributing Editor to the Civil Court Practice (The Green Book) and Editor-in Chief of the Caribbean Civil Court Practice.

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

The revised Part 36: an offer they cannot defuse? By David di Mambro

David di Mambro provides a masterclass in Part 36

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll