header-logo header-logo

david_dimambro

David di Mambro

Barrister

David di Mambro, Member Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) 2003-2009, co-opted from 2009-2013; Chairman of Part 36 Sub Committee 2011-2013. Upon standing down as co-opted member of CPRC, David remained a member of the Sub Committee, which was thereafter chaired by Edward Pepperall QC. David is a barrister and Chartered Arbitrator practising in Radcliffe Chambers, where he has a commercial and property practice. David is Senior Contributing Editor to the Civil Court Practice (The Green Book) and Editor-in Chief of the Caribbean Civil Court Practice.

Barrister

David di Mambro, Member Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) 2003-2009, co-opted from 2009-2013; Chairman of Part 36 Sub Committee 2011-2013. Upon standing down as co-opted member of CPRC, David remained a member of the Sub Committee, which was thereafter chaired by Edward Pepperall QC. David is a barrister and Chartered Arbitrator practising in Radcliffe Chambers, where he has a commercial and property practice. David is Senior Contributing Editor to the Civil Court Practice (The Green Book) and Editor-in Chief of the Caribbean Civil Court Practice.

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

The revised Part 36: an offer they cannot defuse? By David di Mambro

David di Mambro provides a masterclass in Part 36

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll