header-logo header-logo

david_dimambro

David di Mambro

Barrister

David di Mambro, Member Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) 2003-2009, co-opted from 2009-2013; Chairman of Part 36 Sub Committee 2011-2013. Upon standing down as co-opted member of CPRC, David remained a member of the Sub Committee, which was thereafter chaired by Edward Pepperall QC. David is a barrister and Chartered Arbitrator practising in Radcliffe Chambers, where he has a commercial and property practice. David is Senior Contributing Editor to the Civil Court Practice (The Green Book) and Editor-in Chief of the Caribbean Civil Court Practice.

Barrister

David di Mambro, Member Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) 2003-2009, co-opted from 2009-2013; Chairman of Part 36 Sub Committee 2011-2013. Upon standing down as co-opted member of CPRC, David remained a member of the Sub Committee, which was thereafter chaired by Edward Pepperall QC. David is a barrister and Chartered Arbitrator practising in Radcliffe Chambers, where he has a commercial and property practice. David is Senior Contributing Editor to the Civil Court Practice (The Green Book) and Editor-in Chief of the Caribbean Civil Court Practice.

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

The revised Part 36: an offer they cannot defuse? By David di Mambro

David di Mambro provides a masterclass in Part 36

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll