header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

John De Waal KC

King's Counsel

John de Waal KC, Hardwicke chambers (john.dewaal@hardwicke.co.ukwww.hardwicke.co.uk)

King's Counsel

John de Waal KC, Hardwicke chambers (john.dewaal@hardwicke.co.ukwww.hardwicke.co.uk)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Jane Austen has found her way into court to aid with interpretation, observes John de Waal QC

Easy to spot but difficult to prove, John de Waal QC reports

John de Waal QC reports on an unsettling decision on the validity of contractual notices

Andy Creer & John de Waal consider the effect of the decision in Murphy v Wyatt

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll