Paul McKeown
Associate professor
Paul McKeown is associate professor of law and Adrian Keane is emeritus professor of law, both at The City Law School, City St George’s, University of London. Sally Stares is associate professor (education), Department of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science. Newlawjournal.co.uk
Associate professor
Paul McKeown is associate professor of law and Adrian Keane is emeritus professor of law, both at The City Law School, City St George’s, University of London. Sally Stares is associate professor (education), Department of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science. Newlawjournal.co.uk
Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane & Sally Stares analyse the problems with the current directions on the criminal standard of proof
Directing the jury on the standard of proof & meaning of ‘sure’ is no easy task, writes Paul McKeown
Show
8
Results
8
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace
Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team
Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall
Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role
Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei
Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert
NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners
Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.
How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct?
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
