header-logo header-logo

Employment

Subscribe

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Annabels (Berkeley Square) Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 170 (Jun)

Gravil v Carroll and another [2008] EWCA Civ 689, [2008] All ER (D) 234 (Jun)

Gravil v Carroll [2008] EWCA Civ 689, [2008] All ER (D) 234 (Jun)

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
PRINCIPLE
NIT-PICKING

Should courts take into account events which take place after the notional date of trial in a claim for damages for professional negligence? James Counsell reports

In brief

Should employees be paid when they're in prison? Eileen Fry investigates

Katherine Apps considers the practical effect Impact v Maff could have on employment cases

Jurkowska v Hlmad Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 231, [2008] IRLR 430

D'Silva v NATFHE [2008] IRLR 412

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll