header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

An antidote to summer

Ian Smith dissects the latest cases on dismissal law and TUPE transfers

Four cases in the last month are considered here, as an antidote for the wettest August on record (for anyone sad enough to find them a consolation).
Constructive dismissal and bad handling of grievances

Last year the decision of Lady Smith in Abbey National v Fairbrother [2007] IRLR 320, EAT, All ER (D) 24 (Jan) caused some surprise with its holding that the range of reasonable responses test should be applied to the question whether there had been a constructive dismissal, not just to the question whether (if so) it was fair. The matter arose in the context of a dispute over the handling of a grievance and had the effect that the employee would only succeed in establishing constructive dismissal if he could show that the employer had conducted the grievance in a way that no reasonable employer would have done. This is a significant tightening up of the test.

Claridge v Daler Rowney Ltd [2008] IRLR 320, EAT also concerned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll