header-logo header-logo

Law digest

Subscribe

L v CPS [2007] EWHC 1843 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 224 (Jul)

R (Ewing) v Davis [2007] EWHC 1730 (Admin)

Lynch [2007] All ER (D) 346 (Nov)

R v Barney [2007] All ER (D) 98 (Dec)

Gault v UK (App No 1271/05) [2007] All ER (D) 297 (Nov)

AB (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 1302, [2007] All ER (D) 97 (Dec)

Haines v Hill [2007] EWCA Civ 1284, [2007] All ER (D) 56 (Dec)

Mastercigars Direct Ltd v Withers LLP [2007] EWHC 2733 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 385 (Nov)

R v Foster [2007] EWCA Crim 2869, [2007] All ER (D) 507 (Nov); R v Coutts [2006] 4 All ER 353 (HL)

Amendment to the Practice Direction on Costs in Criminal Proceedings (Value Added Tax on Disbursements) [2007] All ER (D) 13 (Dec)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll