header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

TORT

A v Hoare and other appeals [2008] UKHL 6, [2008] All ER (D) 251 (Jan)

A claim for damages for personal injuries caused by a sexual assault falls within the Limitation Act 1980, s 11 and so has a limitation period of three years from the date when the claimant first considered the injury sufficiently serious to justify proceedings—and the judge may extend that period, under s 33, if it is equitable to do so.

 

In determining that date, the test is whether or not a reasonable person with the claimant’s knowledge would have considered the injury sufficiently serious. Such personal characteristics of the claimant as might have prevented him from acting as a reasonable person would have are a matter for judicial discretion under s 33.

 

The House of Lords held that its earlier decision in Stubbings v Webb [1993] AC 498, [1993] 1 All ER 322 was wrongly decided.

Issue: 7308 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James expands national Serious Injury team with two new Partners

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW continues Paris office growth with public law Partner hire

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll