header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

TORT

A v Hoare and other appeals [2008] UKHL 6, [2008] All ER (D) 251 (Jan)

A claim for damages for personal injuries caused by a sexual assault falls within the Limitation Act 1980, s 11 and so has a limitation period of three years from the date when the claimant first considered the injury sufficiently serious to justify proceedings—and the judge may extend that period, under s 33, if it is equitable to do so.

 

In determining that date, the test is whether or not a reasonable person with the claimant’s knowledge would have considered the injury sufficiently serious. Such personal characteristics of the claimant as might have prevented him from acting as a reasonable person would have are a matter for judicial discretion under s 33.

 

The House of Lords held that its earlier decision in Stubbings v Webb [1993] AC 498, [1993] 1 All ER 322 was wrongly decided.

Issue: 7308 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll