header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT LAW

Triggs v GAB Robins (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 17, [2008] All ER (D) 266 (Jan)

The claimant had been constructively dismissed through the employer’s antecedent breaches of the implied term of trust and confidence that had caused her illness and, in turn, reduced her earning capacity.

 

However, it was fallacious to regard those antecedent breaches as constituting the dismissal, since the dismissal was effected by her resignation.

The employee, on a claim for unfair dismissal, is entitled to compensation for whatever loss flowed from that dismissal, but that does not include loss, including future loss, flowing from wrongs already inflicted upon her by the employer’s prior conduct—since those losses, including any future lost income, had not been caused by the dismissal.

 

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll