header-logo header-logo

Michalak v General Medical Council [2016] EWCA Civ 172, [2016] All ER (D) 206 (Mar)

Holcim (Romania) SA v European Commission C-556/14 P, [2016] All ER (D) 52 (Apr)

Walapu v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2016] EWHC 658 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 17 (Apr)

National Crime Agency v Simkus [2016] EWHC 728 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 47 (Apr)

Ian Gray & Associates Ltd v Investments Ltd (in liquidation) [2016] EWHC 724 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 42 (Apr)

Re YW [2016] EWCOP 18, [2016] All ER (D) 45 (Apr)

Howe v Motor Insurers’ Bureau [2016] EWHC 640 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 210 (Mar)

Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Cheshire East Borough Council and another [2016] EWCA Civ 168, [2016] All ER (D) 172 (Mar)

Estrada v Al-Juffali (Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs intervening) [2016] EWCA Civ 176, [2016] All ER (D) 197 (Mar)

Ciccone v Ritchie (No 2) [2016] EWHC 616 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 201 (Mar)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll