header-logo header-logo

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov and others [2011] EWHC 1136 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 81 (May)

R (on the application of Adams)(FC) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] All ER (D) 87 (May)

Masri v Consolidated Contractors International SAL and others [2011] EWHC 1024 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 78 (May)

Renwick and another v Simon and Michael Brooke Architects and other companies [2011] EWHC 874 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 36 (May)

To what extent (if at all) can the lack of equity in a property be taken into account by the court...

Is there an obligation on the part of a divorce petition respondent who seeks a cross-decree...

I assume that the inspection procedure against third parties under FPR rule 21.2 will allow inspection by the judge at court...

I do not understand how FPR rule 33.3(2)(b) will work...

Why does the practice form for approval of a child settlement (N292) provide for a stay of proceedings...

Mensch und Natur AG v Freistaat Bayern C-327/09, [2011] All ER (D) 23 (May)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll