header-logo header-logo

Delivering the goods—lessons from Farepack

16 September 2020 / Professor Sarah Green , Matthew Barry
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-detail
27526
Sarah Green & Matthew Barry discuss modernising the transfer of ownership rules
  • Why amend the transfer of ownership rules?
  • The Law Commission’s proposed rules.
  • The questions asked in the consultation paper.

The Law Commission has recently launched a consultation on a draft Bill that would amend the rules governing when consumers acquire ownership of goods under sales contracts. The consultation follows on from the Law Commission’s July 2016 Report, Consumer Prepayments on Retailer Insolvency (https://bit.ly/3itIRfj) which recommended reform of the transfer of ownership rules. In this article, we set out the case for reform, briefly explain our proposed rules, and describe the scope of our consultation.

Why amend the transfer of ownership rules?

Consumers often pay for goods in advance of receiving them. This happens whenever consumers buy goods online. It can also happen when consumers pay for goods in a physical store, but the goods have to be made to the consumer’s order, are not available to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll