header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020 / Professor Sarah Green , Matthew Barry
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-detail

Delivering the goods—lessons from Farepack

27526
Sarah Green & Matthew Barry discuss modernising the transfer of ownership rules
  • Why amend the transfer of ownership rules?
  • The Law Commission’s proposed rules.
  • The questions asked in the consultation paper.

The Law Commission has recently launched a consultation on a draft Bill that would amend the rules governing when consumers acquire ownership of goods under sales contracts. The consultation follows on from the Law Commission’s July 2016 Report, Consumer Prepayments on Retailer Insolvency (https://bit.ly/3itIRfj) which recommended reform of the transfer of ownership rules. In this article, we set out the case for reform, briefly explain our proposed rules, and describe the scope of our consultation.

Why amend the transfer of ownership rules?

Consumers often pay for goods in advance of receiving them. This happens whenever consumers buy goods online. It can also happen when consumers pay for goods in a physical store, but the goods have to be made to the consumer’s order, are not available to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll