header-logo header-logo

‘Suspicionless’ stop & search in the House of Lords

17 March 2023 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8017 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail
114795
Neil Parpworth reports on the scrutiny of the Public Order Bill—and its proposed new powers for stop & search—in the House of Lords
  • During the Public Order Bill’s passage through the House of Lords, various of its provisions have come under attack, including the new stop and search powers conferred under clauses 10 and 11.
  • The Lords’ act of excising clause 11 from the Public Order Bill at the report stage signifies the justifiable concerns relating to the existence of suspicionless stop and search powers.

Clauses 10 and 11 of the Public Order Bill (as sent from the Commons to the Lords on 19 October 2022) sought to confer stop and search powers on the police in respect of items or articles, or ‘prohibited objects’, which may be used to commit:

i. a wilful obstruction of the highway contrary to s 137 of the Highways Act 1980;

ii. an intentional or reckless causing of a public nuisance contrary to s 78 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll