header-logo header-logo

17 March 2023 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8017 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

‘Suspicionless’ stop & search in the House of Lords

114795
Neil Parpworth reports on the scrutiny of the Public Order Bill—and its proposed new powers for stop & search—in the House of Lords
  • During the Public Order Bill’s passage through the House of Lords, various of its provisions have come under attack, including the new stop and search powers conferred under clauses 10 and 11.
  • The Lords’ act of excising clause 11 from the Public Order Bill at the report stage signifies the justifiable concerns relating to the existence of suspicionless stop and search powers.

Clauses 10 and 11 of the Public Order Bill (as sent from the Commons to the Lords on 19 October 2022) sought to confer stop and search powers on the police in respect of items or articles, or ‘prohibited objects’, which may be used to commit:

i. a wilful obstruction of the highway contrary to s 137 of the Highways Act 1980;

ii. an intentional or reckless causing of a public nuisance contrary to s 78 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll