header-logo header-logo

17 March 2023 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8017 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

‘Suspicionless’ stop & search in the House of Lords

114795
Neil Parpworth reports on the scrutiny of the Public Order Bill—and its proposed new powers for stop & search—in the House of Lords
  • During the Public Order Bill’s passage through the House of Lords, various of its provisions have come under attack, including the new stop and search powers conferred under clauses 10 and 11.
  • The Lords’ act of excising clause 11 from the Public Order Bill at the report stage signifies the justifiable concerns relating to the existence of suspicionless stop and search powers.

Clauses 10 and 11 of the Public Order Bill (as sent from the Commons to the Lords on 19 October 2022) sought to confer stop and search powers on the police in respect of items or articles, or ‘prohibited objects’, which may be used to commit:

i. a wilful obstruction of the highway contrary to s 137 of the Highways Act 1980;

ii. an intentional or reckless causing of a public nuisance contrary to s 78 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll