header-logo header-logo

28 March 2025 / Natalie Todd
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International , Commercial , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail

1 July 2025: Hague Judgments Day

212898
If widely ratified, Hague 2019 will enhance global access to justice, writes Natalie Todd
  • Summarises when Hague 2019 will apply in England and Wales, which judgments are covered, the ‘jurisdictional filters’ that apply in order to ensure enforcement is mandatory, and the grounds for refusal.
  • Also sets out the procedure to be followed, as well as the contracting states and those that are yet to ratify Hague 2019.

In the international world we now operate in, defendants have assets in multiple jurisdictions. It would simplify matters enormously if a claimant could obtain a judgment against the defendant and then enforce that judgment in other countries where assets are held. This can be a complicated process given that each country has its own rules determining whether and how foreign judgments can be enforced. There can be significant delays and expense in following local enforcement processes in multiple countries.

The 2019 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (Hague 2019)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll