header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

2017: less reasons to be cheerful?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
15 December 2017 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7774 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7774_solon

Fee reductions, the rise in litigants in person & the tight timetables mean expert witnesses are not happy as Mark Solon explains

Expert witnesses play a major part in the legal system providing guidance and expressing independent professional opinions to help judges and juries understand technical issues such as the cause of an injury or the value of a company. The survey shows experts are not happy, particularly because of reduced fees, the rise in litigants in person and the tight timetables.

Legal aid cuts

The have been many cuts to the legal aid budget in the last few years and these have impacted experts. The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LAPSO) has removed more than £350m from the civil legal aid budget .

Over a third of experts who could work in legal aid cases would now refuse to do so. Experts are not obliged to accept legal aid cases and expert work is for most a secondary source of income. If the fees are too

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll