header-logo header-logo

2020 vision: Litigating in 2022

11 March 2022 / Michael Frisby
Issue: 7970 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
74293
As we dare to hope that lockdown is now behind us, what has changed since the pandemic & how will it impact the practice of commercial litigation in the post-pandemic environment? Michael Frisby reports

As we entered 2020, the big issue facing the country was Brexit. Parliamentary deadlock had been broken with the election of the Johnson government in December 2020, and all eyes were on the negotiations; the risks of a ‘hard Brexit’ were high on the agenda for businesses and lawyers alike, with concerns that London’s place as a world-leading dispute resolution centre might be at risk. Then the pandemic hit, and in March 2020 the first lockdown took effect.

Pandemic problems

The impact was immediate. On the procedural side, the court and arbitral institutions responded to ensure that business continued, and lawyers adapted and learned to deal with virtual hearings and virtual mediations in no time at all. Electronic bundles became de rigeur and, by necessity, greener modes of doing business were embraced by litigators, the courts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll