header-logo header-logo

11 March 2022 / Michael Frisby
Issue: 7970 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

2020 vision: Litigating in 2022

74293
As we dare to hope that lockdown is now behind us, what has changed since the pandemic & how will it impact the practice of commercial litigation in the post-pandemic environment? Michael Frisby reports

As we entered 2020, the big issue facing the country was Brexit. Parliamentary deadlock had been broken with the election of the Johnson government in December 2020, and all eyes were on the negotiations; the risks of a ‘hard Brexit’ were high on the agenda for businesses and lawyers alike, with concerns that London’s place as a world-leading dispute resolution centre might be at risk. Then the pandemic hit, and in March 2020 the first lockdown took effect.

Pandemic problems

The impact was immediate. On the procedural side, the court and arbitral institutions responded to ensure that business continued, and lawyers adapted and learned to deal with virtual hearings and virtual mediations in no time at all. Electronic bundles became de rigeur and, by necessity, greener modes of doing business were embraced by litigators, the courts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll