header-logo header-logo

11 July 2025 / Rebecca Sabben-Clare KC
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court , Freezing orders
printer mail-detail

Freezing injunctions at 50 (Pt 2)

225402
After half a century, the freezing injunction is growing bolder & bolder, writes Rebecca Sabben-Clare KC
  • Since 1975, freezing injunctions have expanded in scope and complexity. Recent case law has debated what assets are caught and whether the ‘good arguable case’ test aligns with the ‘serious issue to be tried’ standard.
  • Practical challenges persist, including the high cost of applications and the burden of rapid disclosure on defendants.

As Mary Young wrote recently in this journal, Mareva injunctions (freezing orders) were born on 23 June 1975, when the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mareva Cia Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA The Mareva [1980] 1 All ER 213 (see ‘50 years & counting’, NLJ, 13 June 2025, p9).

Fifty years later, senior judges and lawyers met on 23 June 2025 for a seminar to mark the 50th anniversary. Lord Denning MR opened his judgment in The Mareva by saying that the case raised a ‘very important point of practice’, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll