header-logo header-logo

11 July 2025 / Rebecca Sabben-Clare KC
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court , Freezing orders
printer mail-detail

Freezing injunctions at 50 (Pt 2)

225402
After half a century, the freezing injunction is growing bolder & bolder, writes Rebecca Sabben-Clare KC
  • Since 1975, freezing injunctions have expanded in scope and complexity. Recent case law has debated what assets are caught and whether the ‘good arguable case’ test aligns with the ‘serious issue to be tried’ standard.
  • Practical challenges persist, including the high cost of applications and the burden of rapid disclosure on defendants.

As Mary Young wrote recently in this journal, Mareva injunctions (freezing orders) were born on 23 June 1975, when the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mareva Cia Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA The Mareva [1980] 1 All ER 213 (see ‘50 years & counting’, NLJ, 13 June 2025, p9).

Fifty years later, senior judges and lawyers met on 23 June 2025 for a seminar to mark the 50th anniversary. Lord Denning MR opened his judgment in The Mareva by saying that the case raised a ‘very important point of practice’, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll